PAMILANGA LTDPAMIR/CUAS
EVIDENCE-GRADE COUNTER-UAS VALIDATION RESEARCH PROTOTYPE

When outcomes fail,
reconstruct why.

PAMIR-CUAS is an independent validation and incident-reconstruction layer for Counter-UAS systems. After a test or incident, it analyzes sensor and C2 evidence to identify timing faults, sensor disagreement and evidence that materially changed the outcome.

RADAR · RF · EO/IR · C2PAMIR-CUASCAUSAL FINDING · EVIDENCE GRAPH · COUNTERFACTUAL REPLAY
POST-TEST / OFFLINEVENDOR-NEUTRALNO WEAPON CONTROL
INCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION / SYNTHETICCASE CUAS-001
RADARRFEO/IRSTALECOUNTERFACTUAL REPLAYRF-001 EXCLUDEDOUTCOME CHANGEDCAUSAL EVIDENCE GRAPH
TRACE / EXPLAIN / RECONSTRUCTABSTRACTED NON-OPERATIONAL VIEW
01 / POSITION

Not another sensor.
Not another effector.

An independent validation and forensics layer for evidence already produced by Counter-UAS systems.

01SENSOR / C2Radar · RF · EO/IR · Other
02PAMIR-CUASValidation & forensics
03EVIDENCE OUTPUTGraph · finding · replay
02 / EVIDENCE ARCHITECTURE

From observations to
defensible reconstruction.

01

Normalized evidence

Sensor and C2 observations, independent ground truth, timestamps and confidence.

02

Causal evidence graph

Provenance, association and contribution lineage across the evidence chain.

03

Temporal integrity

Clock offset, stale evidence and out-of-order observations surfaced for inspection.

04

Counterfactual replay

Safe offline exclusion or correction tests whether suspect evidence changed the outcome.

03 / TEST-BACKED PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Claims follow evidence.

Public claims are limited to behavior exercised by the current research prototype's automated tests and specification.

CUAS-001 / STALE RF EVIDENCETEST PASS
STALE

Temporal stale evidence

Baseline
False positive
Anomaly
Temporal stale evidence
Counterfactual
Suspect evidence excluded
Result
Outcome changed
CUAS-002 / SENSOR DISAGREEMENTTEST PASS

Sensor disagreement

Baseline
False positive
Anomaly
Sensor disagreement
Counterfactual
Disagreeing evidence excluded
Result
Outcome changed
RESEARCH PROTOTYPE · SYNTHETIC TEST CASES · AUTOMATED TEST-BACKED CLAIMS · NO FIELD-VALIDATION CLAIM
04 / INTEGRATION VALUE

Built for the questions
that appear after the test.

Why did this false positive occur?

Which evidence materially changed the outcome?

Was the anomaly causal or merely correlated?

Did timing integrity alter the decision?

Can the result be reproduced and inspected?

05 / SAFETY BOUNDARY

Validation infrastructure.
Not engagement logic.

PAMIR-CUAS does not perform target selection, weapon control, engagement decisions, interceptor guidance, firing solutions or effector optimization.

NO TARGET SELECTIONNO WEAPON CONTROLNO ENGAGEMENT DECISIONSNO INTERCEPTOR GUIDANCE
TECHNICAL DIALOGUE

Make decision paths
inspectable.

For technical evaluation, validation studies and integration dialogue.
cuas@pamilanga.com